Todd Bertoch, MD
Chief Medical Office, Principal Investigator
CenExel Clinical Research
Salt lake, Utah
Harold Minkowitz, MD
President – Analgesics, Perioperative & Hospital Based Research
Evolution Research Group
New Providence, New Jersey
Susanne R. Vogt, n/a
Senior Clinical Sciences Lead
Viatris
Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Hessen
Scott Haughie, MS
Statistics Team Lead
Viatris/Mylan Pharma UK Ltd.
Sandwich, England
Kathleen Ocasio, BS
Senior Director, Global Clinical Operations
Viatris
Canonsburg, Pennsylvania
Jeffrey Smith, Ph.D.
Head of Preclinical and Toxicology
Viatris
Morgantown, West Virginia
Of 579 randomized participants (232 MR-107A-02, 231 placebo,116 tramadol; 96.3% males;84 % whites; mean [SD] age, 49.1 [12.21] years; weight range, 44-152 kg), 551 participants completed the study. The baseline NRS-A scores (mean [SD]) were similar across all three groups (7.8 [1.66] MR-107A-02, 7.7 (1.68) placebo, 7.8 [1.57] tramadol).
The primary endpoint SPID0-48 (NRS-A), for MR-107A-02 versus placebo, was met. The least squares mean (SE) [95% CI] of SPID0-48 (NRS-A) for MR-107A-02 was 163.1 (8.99) [145.5, 180.7] vs. 113.0 (9.16) [95.0, 131.0] for placebo, with treatment difference of 50.1 (7.48) [35.4, 64.8], p < 0.001. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with tramadol versus placebo, showing a treatment difference of 29.5 (9.0) [14.7, 44.3]; p < 0.001.
In post-hoc analysis, MR-107A-02 showed a higher SPID0-48 compared to tramadol: 162.2 (11.05) [140.5, 183.8] vs. 141.3 (12.16) [121.3, 161.2], with a treatment difference of 20.9 (9.34) [5.6, 36.3], p = 0.025.
MR-107A-02 demonstrated a shorter time to perceptible pain relief compared to placebo (median [CI], hours) (0.9 [0.8, 1.0] vs 1.1 [0.9, 2.1]; p= 0.014) and was comparable to tramadol (0.9 [0.7, 1.5]).
Time to meaningful pain relief was also shorter for MR-107A-02 compared to placebo (median [CI], hours) (3.7 [2.9, 5.3] vs NA [4.1, NA]; p= 0.025) and tramadol (5.0 [3.0, NA]). Both the pain relief endpoints demonstrated a significantly faster onset of action for MR-107A-02 compared to placebo.
Overall, MR-107A-02 was well-tolerated with the fewest treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among all groups during the in-patient phase. The number of severe or serious TEAEs was lower in MR-107A-02 and comparable to placebo. During the in-patient treatment period, the most common adverse events (AEs) in the MR-107A-02 group were constipation (7.0%, MR-107A-02; 14.1%, placebo; 20.9%, tramadol), dizziness (5.7%,5.3%,11.3%), headache (5.2%, 7.9%, 4.3%), and hyperhidrosis (6.5%, 6.6%, 7.0%).
Conclusions/Implications for future research and/or clinical care:
MR-107A-02 (15 mg BID) was effective in reducing the acute, moderate-to-severe pain following herniorrhaphy, as demonstrated by SPID0-48 values compared with placebo, and with a superior efficacy profile to its opioid comparator. The twice daily dose of MR-107A-02 produced a rapid onset of analgesia, as evidenced by the shorter time taken to achieve meaningful pain relief compared to placebo, with a well-tolerated safety profile.